<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health Care Part Deux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.craigsanatomy.com/2007/07/health-care-part-deux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.craigsanatomy.com/2007/07/health-care-part-deux/</link>
	<description>I'd like to thank the interwebs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 20:45:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lugubrious sanity</title>
		<link>http://www.craigsanatomy.com/2007/07/health-care-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>lugubrious sanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigsanatomy.com/?p=58#comment-74</guid>
		<description>A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke -- Groucho Marx
 Stocks have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau. Irving Fisher, Professor of Economics, Yale University, 1929.


If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee -- that will do them in -- Bradley&#039;s Bromide
 I don&#039;t care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members -- Groucho Marx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke &#8212; Groucho Marx<br />
 Stocks have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau. Irving Fisher, Professor of Economics, Yale University, 1929.</p>
<p>If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee &#8212; that will do them in &#8212; Bradley&#8217;s Bromide<br />
 I don&#8217;t care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members &#8212; Groucho Marx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Lambelet</title>
		<link>http://www.craigsanatomy.com/2007/07/health-care-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Lambelet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigsanatomy.com/?p=58#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Craig,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Watched Sicko last night. You should definately spend the two hours to see it. Certainly he brings a pretty narrow lens, but it does drive home the point made above about caring for our neighbors. What we do as a society to the &quot;least of these&quot; makes me sick. It is completely disgusting. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And then to blame the abuse on those who suffer under it because they can&#039;t pull themselves up by their bootstraps is not only just politically ignorant but is spiritually blasphemous.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What kind of people are we (as a nation, as a church, as members of the human family) if we allow those  who live in our communities to die (literally) when a medical procedure could significantly extend the length and quality of ones life? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It seems truly insane to me. Anyway, I&#039;d love to hear more of your thoughts on this (you&#039;ve allowed everyone else to voice their opinions, now it&#039;s time for you to get in).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig,</p>
<p>Watched Sicko last night. You should definately spend the two hours to see it. Certainly he brings a pretty narrow lens, but it does drive home the point made above about caring for our neighbors. What we do as a society to the &#8220;least of these&#8221; makes me sick. It is completely disgusting. </p>
<p>And then to blame the abuse on those who suffer under it because they can&#8217;t pull themselves up by their bootstraps is not only just politically ignorant but is spiritually blasphemous.</p>
<p>What kind of people are we (as a nation, as a church, as members of the human family) if we allow those  who live in our communities to die (literally) when a medical procedure could significantly extend the length and quality of ones life? </p>
<p>It seems truly insane to me. Anyway, I&#8217;d love to hear more of your thoughts on this (you&#8217;ve allowed everyone else to voice their opinions, now it&#8217;s time for you to get in).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Lambelet</title>
		<link>http://www.craigsanatomy.com/2007/07/health-care-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Lambelet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigsanatomy.com/?p=58#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Your Canadian friend makes a compelling argument for socialized health care. Visit a public hospital in any major US city (if it hasn&#039;t been closed due to lack of funds) and you will see another compelling argument for systematic change.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have to confess that I am one of th 45.8 million who doesn&#039;t have health insurance in the US (visit http://www.census.gov/prod/&lt;br/&gt;2005pubs/p60-229.pdf, no break). So my reflections on the state of the health care system emerge from my own experience.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It is interesting to me that your friend&#039;s way of conceptualizing the health care system in Canada actually moves us away from the frighteningly impersonal bureaucracy that so many are anxious about and toward a more &quot;neighborly&quot; society. The reason for a socialized health system emerges from the desire that our neighbors and friends who are poor (as well as rich) have all of their basic health needs taken care of. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I do have some hesitation about receiving health care from the perpetrator of preemptive strikes and perpetual war through the war on(of) &quot;terror.&quot; But it may be that grass-roots health co-ops might form a parallel structure to governmental and corporate health care that can hold both accountable.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In any case, I&#039;m going to work for a society in which the kind of neighborly concern (justice) that your Canadian friend spoke of is the norm. After all, isn&#039;t that what the parable of the good Samaritan is all about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Canadian friend makes a compelling argument for socialized health care. Visit a public hospital in any major US city (if it hasn&#8217;t been closed due to lack of funds) and you will see another compelling argument for systematic change.</p>
<p>I have to confess that I am one of th 45.8 million who doesn&#8217;t have health insurance in the US (visit <a href="http://www.census.gov/prod/" rel="nofollow">http://www.census.gov/prod/</a><br />2005pubs/p60-229.pdf, no break). So my reflections on the state of the health care system emerge from my own experience.</p>
<p>It is interesting to me that your friend&#8217;s way of conceptualizing the health care system in Canada actually moves us away from the frighteningly impersonal bureaucracy that so many are anxious about and toward a more &#8220;neighborly&#8221; society. The reason for a socialized health system emerges from the desire that our neighbors and friends who are poor (as well as rich) have all of their basic health needs taken care of. </p>
<p>I do have some hesitation about receiving health care from the perpetrator of preemptive strikes and perpetual war through the war on(of) &#8220;terror.&#8221; But it may be that grass-roots health co-ops might form a parallel structure to governmental and corporate health care that can hold both accountable.</p>
<p>In any case, I&#8217;m going to work for a society in which the kind of neighborly concern (justice) that your Canadian friend spoke of is the norm. After all, isn&#8217;t that what the parable of the good Samaritan is all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

