<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Telekenesis!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.craigsanatomy.com/2007/12/telekenesis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.craigsanatomy.com/2007/12/telekenesis/</link>
	<description>I'd like to thank the interwebs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 20:45:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: unkind lattice</title>
		<link>http://www.craigsanatomy.com/2007/12/telekenesis/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>unkind lattice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigsanatomy.com/?p=70#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Quoting Coulter is kind of like quoting Joe McCarthy; no doubt it does well when you&#039;re pandering to a group of like-minded hate mongerers, but it earns you a well-deserved reputation as a vicious, mean-spirited airhead and intellecual lightweight in more analytical and dispassionate circles -- Mark Vaughan in borlandpublicoff-topic
 A blind bloke walks into a shop with a guide dog He picks the Dog up and starts swinging it around his head Alarmed, a shop assistant calls out: &#039;Can I help, sir?&#039; &#039;No thanks,&#039; says the blind bloke &#039;Just looking&#039;  -- Tommy Cooper


If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get a million miles per gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside -- Robert X Cringely
 Are we at last brought to such a humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defense?  Where is the difference between having our arms in our possession and under our own direction, and having them under the management of Congress?  If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hand?  PATRICK HENRY,  3 Elliot Debates 168-169.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoting Coulter is kind of like quoting Joe McCarthy; no doubt it does well when you&#8217;re pandering to a group of like-minded hate mongerers, but it earns you a well-deserved reputation as a vicious, mean-spirited airhead and intellecual lightweight in more analytical and dispassionate circles &#8212; Mark Vaughan in borlandpublicoff-topic<br />
 A blind bloke walks into a shop with a guide dog He picks the Dog up and starts swinging it around his head Alarmed, a shop assistant calls out: &#8216;Can I help, sir?&#8217; &#8216;No thanks,&#8217; says the blind bloke &#8216;Just looking&#8217;  &#8212; Tommy Cooper</p>
<p>If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get a million miles per gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside &#8212; Robert X Cringely<br />
 Are we at last brought to such a humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defense?  Where is the difference between having our arms in our possession and under our own direction, and having them under the management of Congress?  If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hand?  PATRICK HENRY,  3 Elliot Debates 168-169.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

